A formal petition or memorandum submitted by Charles Lutwidge to the Treasury Lords, arguing for repeal of a restrictive trade clause imposed after the 1765 Revestment. Lutwidge contends that the clause was temporary and its purpose has been satisfied, and that existing statutory controls on tea, spirits, coffee, tobacco, and manufactures are sufficient to protect British revenue without the additional restriction.
A paper submitted to the Lords of the Treasury by Charles Lutwidge arguing for repeal of a trade clause imposed on the Isle of Man following the 1765 Revestment. Lutwidge contends that the clause was temporary, that strict controls are already in place via Act 7 Geo.3 Cap 45, and that improved customs enforcement makes further restrictions unnecessary. This document reflects post-Revestment administrative tensions over trade regulation.
Two letters from Governor John Wood of the Isle of Man to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, dated 14 March 1772, requesting payment of arrears of salary (£1,300+) and drawing bills on the Treasury for £1,000. The letters reveal post-Revestment financial dysfunction, with revenues diverted to harbour improvements and remitted to London, leaving civil establishment personnel unpaid. Also includes a 1768 bill for £1,400 showing Wood's persistent payment difficulties.
Two letters from Governor John Wood to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury and an unnamed lord, dated 14 March 1772, concerning unpaid salary arrears exceeding £1300. Wood requests £1000 via bill of exchange drawn on Messrs Drummond & Co, citing administrative dysfunction and the diversion of island revenues to harbour improvements rather than civil establishment payments. The file also includes a related warrant from 1768 for £1400. Documents reveal post-Revestment payment dysfunction and tension between Wood and Receiver General Lutwidge.
Two letters from Governor John Wood to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury and to an unnamed Lord, requesting payment of £1,300+ in accumulated salary arrears and drawing a bill for £1,000 to meet expenses. The document reveals post-Revestment financial difficulties, the absence of Receiver General Lutwidge from the island, and systemic failures in the payment of civil officers. A related warrant from March 1768 is also included.
A petition from Manx merchants and inhabitants to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, dated January 1772, complaining of severe trade restrictions imposed after suppression of smuggling. The petition describes hardship in herring fishery, linen/cotton manufacturing, and re-export trade, arguing that the original cause (illicit trade) no longer exists but restrictive statutes remain in force. Key grievances include prohibitions on salt shipments, exclusion from British and colonial markets, seizure of goods, and transshipment requirements.
War Office correspondence dated 14 March 1772 regarding the establishment and pay of four companies of the 42nd (Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot stationed on the Isle of Man. The document notes the pay differential between British and Irish establishment and references the transition following Revestment, including reduction from nine to three/four companies.
War Office memorandum from 14 March 1772 regarding the establishment and pay costs of four companies of the 42nd (Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot stationed on the Isle of Man. Notes that the regiment's establishment commenced 1 September 1771, and that Great Britain funded the difference between British and Irish pay rates. Includes editorial note on troop reduction to three companies within a year due to Castle Rushen Barracks capacity.
A formal petition from Manx merchants and inhabitants to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, submitted on 20 January 1772, requesting relief from post-Revestment penal statutes restricting trade. The petitioners argue that smuggling has ceased but commercial restrictions remain, damaging herring fisheries, linen/cotton manufacturing, and general commerce. The document illustrates the economic hardship experienced by Manx inhabitants in the aftermath of the 1765 Revestment and the unintended consequences of anti-smuggling legislation.
Letter from Governor John Wood of the Isle of Man to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, dated 14 March 1772, requesting immediate payment of £1000 against his overdue salary of over £1300. Wood notes that Receiver General Lutwidge had advised in October and November 1771 that he awaited Treasury directions for payment, but no response was received. The letter demonstrates post-Revestment administrative friction and salary payment difficulties faced by the Governor.
Letter from Governor John Wood to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury dated 14 March 1772, requesting payment of overdue salary (£1300+) by drawing a draft for £1000 on John Drummond & Co. Wood notes that Charles Lutwidge, the Receiver General, had refused payment without Treasury directions in October 1771 and November 1771, but has provided no further communication. The document illustrates post-Revestment administrative difficulties and tensions between the Governor and the absentee Receiver General.
A memorial petition from Charles Searle, Attorney General of the Isle of Man, to the Treasury Lords requesting an increase to his £100 annual salary, citing inadequate compensation for his duties and the declining profitability of legal practice on the island. Undated but contextually placed c.1768–1774, the document illuminates post-Revestment administrative challenges, revenue matters, harbour jurisdiction, and the Crown's assumption of powers previously held by the Duke of Atholl.
Memorial from Charles Searle, Attorney General of the Isle of Man, to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury requesting an increase to his £100 annual salary. Searle details inadequate compensation, office expenses, and compulsory unpaid legal work on revenue matters and orphan/widow cases. The document provides insight into the administrative structure and financial arrangements of the Isle of Man post-1768 and the impact of declining trade on legal practice.
Charles Lutwidge's official response to a Merchants' Petition regarding distressed trade conditions on the Isle of Man, submitted to the Treasury Lords for consideration. Lutwidge addresses ten proposals for trade relief, covering foreign trade restrictions, interior commerce, fisheries, and industrial encouragement, recommending selective concessions while opposing measures that might interfere with British trade or revenue.
Charles Lutwidge's official response to a petition from Isle of Man merchants regarding trade distress, submitted to the Treasury Lords for consideration. Addresses proposals for foreign trade relief, interior commerce regulations, fisheries access, and linen/hemp manufacture encouragement. Reflects post-Revestment administrative concerns about balancing Manx economic needs with British revenue and trade protection.
Annual report on harbour maintenance and improvements across Isle of Man ports (Douglas, Ramsey, Castletown, Derbyhaven, and Peel) for the period 1771-1772, submitted to the Harbour Commissioners. Details structural repairs, construction works, and financial accounts. Signed by Charles Lutwidge, Custom House Douglas.
An administrative report submitted to the Commissioners of the Treasury by Charles Lutwidge, surveying the condition of Manx harbours (Douglas, Ramsey, Castletown, Derbyhaven, and Peel) and detailing repairs, improvements, and maintenance undertaken during 1771–1772. The report provides evidence of post-Revestment infrastructure investment and harbour management under British sovereignty.
Charles Lutwidge reports to Grey Cooper at the Treasury on the destruction of Douglas Pier by severe storms. The letter notes the pier's strategic importance for naval sloops and navigation in St George's Channel, and references the recent acquisition of Isle of Man ports by the Crown following the 1765 Revestment.
Administrative letter from Charles Lutwidge (Collector of Customs at Whitehaven) to Grey Cooper at the Treasury, reporting the destruction of Douglas Pier by storms and noting its strategic importance to naval operations. Directly relevant to post-Revestment Crown management of Isle of Man ports and infrastructure.
A batch of official correspondence between Governor John Wood and Treasury officials (via Lord Halifax) concerning the disputed jurisdiction of the Water Bailiff office in the Isle of Man. Wood objects to Charles Lutwidge, as Receiver General, appointing revenue officers as Water Bailiffs, creating confusion between civil and revenue functions. Lutwidge's detailed response defends the historical integration of the Water Bailiff office within the Revenue Department, supported by statutory extracts dating to 1422. Central to post-Revestment governance tensions.
A collection of official correspondence between Governor John Wood, Treasury officials, and Charles Lutwidge (Receiver General) concerning the controversial vesting of the Water Bailiff office in revenue officers rather than civil magistrates. Wood argues this creates jurisdictional confusion; Lutwidge defends the historical precedent and necessity for revenue control. Includes supporting documents and statutory extracts from 1422–1711 establishing the Water Bailiff's dual civil-revenue role.
A formal petition from the Keys (Manx parliament) to Governor John Wood, forwarded to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, detailing economic hardships and commercial restrictions imposed on Isle of Man since the 1765 Revestment. The memorial complains of prohibitions on trade, shipping, and export of provisions, and requests relief comparable to that granted to Guernsey and Jersey.
A petition from the Keys of Mann (Manx legislature) to Governor John Wood, forwarding a memorial to the Crown regarding the economic distress of the Isle of Man. The Keys complain of restrictions on commerce, fishing, and export under recent Acts of Parliament, economic decline, emigration, and request relief comparable to that granted to Guernsey and Jersey. This document reflects post-Revestment grievances and demonstrates the impact of British commercial restrictions on the Manx economy.
A formal petition from the Keys (Manx Parliament) and merchants to King George III, requesting relief from post-Revestment trade restrictions that have severely damaged the island's economy. The petition details economic distress, population emigration, declining fisheries, harbour decay, and loss of military garrison, arguing that the 1765 restrictive legislation was designed for the proprietary smuggling trade which no longer exists. Accompanied by a covering letter from Governor John Wood and supporting memorial.
A petition from the Keys (Manx parliament) and merchants to King George III, dated February 1769, requesting relief from restrictive post-Revestment trade laws. Accompanied by a letter from Governor John Wood presenting the petition to the Lords of the Treasury. The petition details economic distress caused by trade restrictions, emigration, declining fisheries, and reduced military presence, while emphasizing Manx loyalty and requesting commercial privileges equal to other British dominions.
